(03-16-2016, 09:23 PM)Fiction Wrote: yeah you and warden were the only two people I know who truly liked him.

I still don't even really know anything about Rubio. Except that his name is one letter away from being Rufio from the Robin Williams film "Hook." I wouldn't have voted for him had he miraculously become his party's nominee, anyhow. I mean Rubio; Rufio I might have voted for.

I've been so focused on the greater evil that I haven't had time to learn anything about the lesser ones.

(03-16-2016, 06:22 PM)Fiction Wrote: So fucking happy Rubio dropped out. From what little I've seen of the debates, that dude was so dumb, he'd make Trump and Bush look smart sometimes.

Like seriously, he said he liked EDM because it's kid friendly.

Try enjoying this track around your kids:

Spoiler

I dont know who to vote for. hillary is antigun which translate to she will take all american freedoms, gun related or not, away.
bernie is socialist which means next hitler.
trump is wealthy meaning he wont do a damn thing to help anyone but the wealthy.

who is left that isn't utterly useless or a problem?

I've decided to start learning Mandarin Chinese.

Fun adventures await!

(03-18-2016, 07:14 AM)Mercyknight Wrote: I dont know who to vote for. hillary is antigun which translate to she will take all american freedoms, gun related or not, away.
bernie is socialist which means next hitler.
trump is wealthy meaning he wont do a damn thing to help anyone but the wealthy.

If Clinton's anti-gun stance is all you're concerned about, you really needn't worry. As much as I'd love to see America successfully enact far stricter gun ownership policies, there's no way Clinton's going to take everyone's guns away. It just isn't going to happen.

Socialist doesn't equal "next Hitler." If anything, I'd say that Trump is more comparable to Hitler based on his reliance upon prejudice-fueled scapegoatism. Trump is running on a platform of fear and hate; that's the sort of shit that produces dangerous and terrible leaders.

And I agree with your assessment of Trump.

My opinion

I'd go Hillary, she had the experience and will for the job, her hopes aren't that bad and are mostly good. There's no way she'll get the anti gun bill through a Republican Majority senate and house.

Cruz creeps me out and I don't like him

Kasich has no chance of winning but I do like him

Bernie doesn't understand that taxing the 1% won't fund free college and health care for everybody.

And Trump is a crazy mofo who I wouldn't vote for even if there was a gun to my head

I'm honestly hoping both parties do end up getting fractured to be honest. It's how our government fragments us.

For some reason I feel more aggressive than usual today.

I find it ironic that the colors red, white, and blue stand for freedom until they are flashing behind you.

(03-18-2016, 08:54 AM)Ziggy and Angelbaby Wrote:

(03-18-2016, 07:14 AM)Mercyknight Wrote: I dont know who to vote for. hillary is antigun which translate to she will take all american freedoms, gun related or not, away.
bernie is socialist which means next hitler.
trump is wealthy meaning he wont do a damn thing to help anyone but the wealthy.

If Clinton's anti-gun stance is all you're concerned about, you really needn't worry. As much as I'd love to see America successfully enact far stricter gun ownership policies, there's no way Clinton's going to take everyone's guns away. It just isn't going to happen.

Socialist doesn't equal "next Hitler." If anything, I'd say that Trump is more comparable to Hitler based on his reliance upon prejudice-fueled scapegoatism. Trump is running on a platform of fear and hate; that's the sort of shit that produces dangerous and terrible leaders.

And I agree with your assessment of Trump.

actually what im looking at with clinton is that
a. the only people who cannot be trusted with guns, are the irresponsible who should be marked by wearing a helmet to indicate sever mental retardation, criminals who should be in prison, and normal folks who are to afraid they will break or hut someone\something.
(that last group is a large percent of the first one)
so there is no reason to have stricter control, if people have common sense about them and thus don't fall into the above groups.

b. politicians have never passed a gun law that actually prevented the bad guys from killing with guns, only ones that made it harder for me to protect my life and others without being against the law.

c. the areas of the country with strict gun control have basically become owned and run by the street gangs, who are not at all even noticed here, nor do you hear of large groups looting stores. and we have our ability to own guns out here.

d. invariably if a politician can make money, they will take from you every right or freedom, in short if clinto will take one, she will also strip us of all and enslave us, thus starting a resistance in the underground that will lead to much damage and loss of life which i feel is more than a little undesired

I think that's a little extreme knight

I don't think Clinton will take away guns, she can't, she doesn't have the authority or power to do so.